Yao teacher title issue in the Internet heat is not reduced, four ranked second failed, ranked 16 teachers against the trend. Anyone who thinks about this matter will feel that there is something fishy, will feel that there is a black box operation. After an investigation by the commission for discipline inspection, except for the trivial, painless, no major violations of discipline. Not only did not find out the black box operation, also did not find out the favoritism malpractice, eat melon people directly quit, this how can there be no corruption?
In fact, this is not what outsiders think. A result that is very like corruption but there is no corruption process, this is the school title review, is also a strange and unique social phenomenon. The cause of this phenomenon lies in the school’s recommendation system, not the problem of operation.
For the school recommendation system, the basic one school one policy. The school sets the recommendation system according to its own characteristics, needs and development goals, which will be implemented after being approved by the staff congress. Ms. Yao also raised her hand in favor of the recommendation system at the meeting, and the results of the system should also be accepted. For reporting and prosecuting this matter, Yao teacher felt that people have a problem. After investigation, it was proved that she was wrong, not because of the people, but because of the system. The school recommendation system is in favor of their own hands, which is also a shot in the foot. If they do Sue, they should Sue the school system for irrationality, which might have a chance of overturning the results. The prosecution and the review process are just a dead end, can not change the result can not hurt people.
The evaluation system of the school is basically modified every year, and the participants are not allowed to participate in the modification, and those who do not participate in the evaluation are not concerned about how to modify. It is usually the principal and the main leaders who take the lead in making changes, sometimes for the sake of the development of the school, sometimes for the sake of gaining an advantage for individuals.
The school revises the draft to take on the teaching staff congress, it is generally the leadership unscramble once, everybody votes through. To tell the truth, most schools most teachers do not like to do is the meeting, leadership interpretation of the time there are few serious listen to, show of hands voting is basically all agree, just to end early. Staff representatives who did not participate in the evaluation did not care what had been changed, and even teachers who participated in the evaluation were confused about the professional title evaluation system and did not even know some important provisions. In the final analysis, this system is basically the will of the school leadership, aesthetic education what the masses will. Of course, not every school is like this, some school teachers are very concerned about the modification of the title system, such a school title system is generally very scientific, very popular.
In the professional title evaluation system, there must be democratic evaluation, but it can not be like Yao school, one is too many evaluation groups, the other is too high evaluation score. Democratic evaluation is mainly about teachers’ ethics and professional and technical ability. The teacher’s moral respect basically is to see if there is no violation of teacher’s moral circumstance. In this respect, if there are no major factual issues, the ethics of teachers should not be ranked, but should be full marks. The professional technical ability mainly depends on the classroom teaching level, which can not rely on the mass vote to define, should be evaluated by the professional authority. Getting fewer votes doesn’t mean you have poor professional and technical ability, it just means you are not popular.
Yao’s school took out three groups to vote, which is a bit irresponsible. And the outcome of the vote can significantly change the outcome, not to mention the past. It would be better to cancel other projects and vote directly on the title recommendation. This should deviate from the recommendation of the title of the department in charge of education with people’s social bureau.
This matter also shows that Yao teacher really does not understand the title system, in the evaluation is not flexible enough. To be honest, the review vote counts for so much that it’s guaranteed anyway. Besides, the title evaluation competition is fierce, 0.01 points are not dare to let go, needless to say ten minutes. The American presidential election needs to hold activities to rally votes, Mr. Yao will not find colleagues and friends to connect? At least not so many that they could be reversed.
You can’t change the system, you must at least learn to use it. As for the results of the operation of the system, there is no other choice but to accept them.
article links：The operation process should not be a major problem
Reprint indicated source：Spark Global Limited information